Comments on: Jaguar I-Pace Owners Outraged Over Removal of Smart Charging Feature https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/ Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:12:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8 By: TechSkeptic https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22346 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:18:29 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22346 In reply to FuturistFrankie.

Or they just messed up and we’re all hoping for too much.

]]>
By: FuturistFrankie https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22345 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:18:28 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22345 Hopefully, Jaguar is planning an upgrade or an even better system. Innovation sometimes requires two steps back to leap forward.

]]>
By: No_Nonsense_Nancy https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22347 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:18:28 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22347 This decision doesn’t seem customer-focused at all. If you’re going to remove features, at least provide a valid reason or a better alternative, Jaguar.

]]>
By: GearHeadGary https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22337 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:18:28 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22337 In reply to Terry_F.

Makes you wonder what they’re thinking. Hope they’re listening to the feedback and planning a fix.

]]>
By: GrumpyGreg https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22344 Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:55:34 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22344 they always take the good stuff away. so annoying man.

]]>
By: Aj_the_dreamer https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22343 Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:42:39 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22343 Maybe they got bigger plans? Let’s wait n see.

]]>
By: EcoWarrior89 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22336 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 06:06:15 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22336 In reply to Terry_F.

Right? It’s not just about convenience but also the environmental impact. Disappointed in Jaguar.

]]>
By: HistorianRick https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22342 Fri, 23 Aug 2024 03:29:39 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22342 While it’s a disappointing decision by Jaguar, let’s not forget the automotive industry has a history of such setbacks. What matters is how they address it moving forward.

]]>
By: jennybeans https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22341 Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:20:23 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22341 Not sure why Jaguar would do this. Doesn’t seem like a smart move if they wanna keep their customers happy.

]]>
By: SkepticalSandy https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22340 Tue, 02 Jul 2024 19:26:17 +0000 https://autotimesnews.com/jaguar-i-pace-owners-outraged-over-removal-of-smart-charging-feature/#comment-22340 Classic big corporation move, taking away features instead of improving. They’ve probably realized they can charge extra for it later. Disappointing but not surprising.

]]>